The case mentioned in PLJ 1997 SC 985 involved a declaration that respondents, getting co-sharers, ended up entrepreneurs from the land. The suit was originally dismissed, but on attractiveness, it had been decreed in favor of the respondents. If these two (two) instances usually do not concur in a single https://johnnyhxtlh.csublogs.com/37705676/5-essential-elements-for-co-ownership-and-partition-wakeel-in-karachi-near-me